I miss conferences, hallway discussions, conference parties, cities I don’t know, cities I know superficially, hotels and hotel bars, even airports and airport shopping and shitty WiFi connections.
While funny, I admit that I use this question often. It’s extremely hard to fake an answer, especially to follow-up questions, if you don’t actually understand what’s happening
To understand what happens when you type a URL into the browser, you have to start with Soviet ICBM program that led to Sputnik and the political landscape that caused Eisenhower to respond with the formation of ARPA.
"Please read the paper before you comment:" me venting about how nobody ever seems to read the primary source before shooting off their hot takes buttondown.email/hillelwayne…
* Sessions can easily be recorded _in addition_ to being streamed live
* Q&As can happen (or be supported by) chat
* Other online interaction tools (like shared whiteboards) may be more usable than their physical counterparts 5/5
* The set of sessions will be part of a curated whole, hopefully set up by a program committee who knew what it was doing
* The fact that it’s a live event means you’ll have to make time for it, and focus while it’s happening
* Speakers *and* audience can interact 4/5
* Audience shares the experience of listening to a session. If the tooling supports it, they can talk to each other and share their thoughts
* The audience can connect with the speaker because they’re actually (virtually) there
* The audience can provide feedback to speakers 3/5
* Speakers and audience can interact. The audience can ask questions. The speaker can ask for a show of hands, or even for opinions.
* Speakers can refer to other talks that happened before theirs, or will happen after theirs.
* Speakers can refer to other current events. 2/5
An excellent question well worth asking! Here’s my list.
* Live talks are more current than recorded ones (at least after a few days)
* Live talks _feel_ different because speakers act differently in front of a live audience, even if they can’t see them. More authentic. 1/5
That’s not the right time line. Windows GUI development with C predates anything remotely suitable for practical GUI development with Java by several years. Windows had moved to C++/MFC long before Swing appeared. And some might even argue MFC used OOP :)