CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @tedneward
We have this incredible way of doing things around here – it’s called “voting on Sundays”
1
4
I miss conferences, hallway discussions, conference parties, cities I don’t know, cities I know superficially, hotels and hotel bars, even airports and airport shopping and shitty WiFi connections.
11
29
5
332
Replying to @ewolff
Exakt ganz genau so
2
OMG, I’m so sad for Facebook and its business partners bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
7
5
1
53
Replying to @svrc
Are you aware domain-driven design uses the terms to refer to one team’s (or context’s) dependence on another team’s changes? Fun.
1
1
While funny, I admit that I use this question often. It’s extremely hard to fake an answer, especially to follow-up questions, if you don’t actually understand what’s happening
Replying to @mjg59
To understand what happens when you type a URL into the browser, you have to start with Soviet ICBM program that led to Sputnik and the political landscape that caused Eisenhower to respond with the formation of ARPA.
8
I’m guilty of this myself. Hillel is right.
"Please read the paper before you comment:" me venting about how nobody ever seems to read the primary source before shooting off their hot takes buttondown.email/hillelwayne…
3
I would be so happy if the people of Belarus managed to rid themselves of their dictator, and peacefully even
2
1
24
Unerträglich. Eine Ermahnung, den Leugnern und Verharmlosern niemals auch nur einen Millimeter nachzugeben
This tweet is unavailable
18
1
25
Replying to @codepo8 @fabiovenni
… 8% (or 9) of your income tax, to be fair. (Opted out myself a long time ago.)
1
Replying to @rotnroll666
Seems to me you could have ordered and consumed 4 pizzas to remain energy-neutral. Amazing!
1
1
Replying to @ChristinGorman
Did you explain things to him appropriately?
1
1
* Sessions can easily be recorded _in addition_ to being streamed live * Q&As can happen (or be supported by) chat * Other online interaction tools (like shared whiteboards) may be more usable than their physical counterparts 5/5
2
1
* The set of sessions will be part of a curated whole, hopefully set up by a program committee who knew what it was doing * The fact that it’s a live event means you’ll have to make time for it, and focus while it’s happening * Speakers *and* audience can interact 4/5
1
1
* Audience shares the experience of listening to a session. If the tooling supports it, they can talk to each other and share their thoughts * The audience can connect with the speaker because they’re actually (virtually) there * The audience can provide feedback to speakers 3/5
1
* Speakers and audience can interact. The audience can ask questions. The speaker can ask for a show of hands, or even for opinions. * Speakers can refer to other talks that happened before theirs, or will happen after theirs. * Speakers can refer to other current events. 2/5
1
An excellent question well worth asking! Here’s my list. * Live talks are more current than recorded ones (at least after a few days) * Live talks _feel_ different because speakers act differently in front of a live audience, even if they can’t see them. More authentic. 1/5
I'm not sold on IT virtual conferences. Why are these better than watching selected Youtube videos about the topic?
1
6
I completely missed the news that the Eclipse Foundation already announced the move to Europe in May
An update on the Eclipse Foundation’s move to Europe eclipse-foundation.blog/2020…
2
4
That’s not the right time line. Windows GUI development with C predates anything remotely suitable for practical GUI development with Java by several years. Windows had moved to C++/MFC long before Swing appeared. And some might even argue MFC used OOP :)
3
2