CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Proof that I’ve spent too much time on this f*ing site #MyTwitterAnniversary
2
14
Replying to @martinfowler
But as a British expat, you could always go home to a saner country, oh, sorry, never mind
12
Your experience differs from mine then, fair enough.
1
Why are you retweeting this complete and utter bullshit, Duncan?
1
2
Don’t involve both me and “Hot Space“ in anything please though
2
1
Replying to @swardley
Don’t worry, I’m well aware of your work, and a few of my colleagues are outright fans. I also violently agree a decade is practically nothing.
1
3
Replying to @hhariri @seebrock3r
Next you’ll admit you order a cappuccino after dinner
2
Replying to @vorsprungbike
I’m saying you need people who are not like me, too.
I agree it’s a nice analogy. In fact it’s almost too good for me to have coined it, so I very well may not have done so. I can’t remember ;)
1
I‘m sure I’ll be your coolest follower. On a related note, don’t even think about blocking me 😎
Replying to @sperbsen
Same here :)
I love it when I learn something in a casual conversation and can publish it as a podcast episode as a side-effect. This @case_podcast on functional architecture with @sperbsen was one of those occasions case-podcast.org/31-mike-spe…
3
6
1
19
Neugierige Frage: Denkt man eigentlich nach, bevor man so etwas schreibt, und entscheidet dann, dass einem die Konsequenzen egal sind? Oder haut man da mal eben raus, was einem durch den Kopf geht, egal wie dämlich es ist?
1
39
Replying to @ghohpe
Indeed, I’ve seen places where a reuse factor of 1 (as in “used even once”) would haven been a vast improvement
1
11
Replying to @Stephen_Mizell
Because they feel this will finally give common structure to their IT; because they believe it will make them faster; because analysts or vendors told them they need to do it
1
2
Replying to @Stephen_Mizell
No. Teams interacting via APIs seems like a completely reasonable approach to me.
1
4
If you provide an API as a product, e.g. as a SaaS provider, you’ll consider the developers your end users. If that’s not the case, my point is that you’re right: Your end users don’t care about APIs, so you shouldn’t put them at the center
1
4
Replying to @mosesjones
I agree that once you’re sure you know what service you want to build (including that you even want to build it in the first place), doing it contract-first is a good idea
4
Yes, I’d definitely prefer that