CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Great piece on the past and (possible) future of #Java/#JVM serialization by @BrianGoetz: cr.openjdk.java.net/~briango…
1
34
1
71
Meine Tochter würde gerne das tolle »internetbasierte Beratungsprogramm LuPO (Laufbahn- und Planungstool Oberstufe)« des Schulministeriums NRW nutzen, um ihre Oberstufenkurse zu planen … leider nur unter Windows und daher nicht für uns verfügbar. Wer baut so einen Mist?
13
11
64
Replying to @phaus
Collecting PII without a person’s consent?
1
How much of a totally fucked up moron do you have to be to think this is a good idea?
This tweet is unavailable
3
7
49
True. I don’t really have a problem if it’s anonymized
Ah, so your take us they’ll be able to do it for the users who have downloaded any of these apps? Might work. They’d still have to tell everyone who they send the data to, and keep an updated list
Yes, I don’t dispute that. My point is: If you setup beacons and collect data without consent, my non-lawyer take is you’re quite clearly in violation of GDPR
1
They could probably get away with doing it e.g. for everyone who has a store-specific loyalty card
Only for a very small percentage, and even then, only for something related to what service I actually request. E.g. they can’t just use data for marketing purposes unless I explicitly and separately opt in. But most wont interact digitally in the first place, anyway, won’t they?
1
Replying to @simkoelsch
That article is from 2013 (fascinating), but that only reinforces my question. Has someone tried to exercise their GDPR rights and/or filed a complaint about one of these?
1
1
I don’t see how they could, but in any case, it would be a nice test to see whether it’s completely pointless or actually useful.
Replying to @nipafx
But then they’d only be able to use it on the (small?) percentage of people who use that, wouldn’t they?
1
1
The exact definition of what “the customer agrees” means here seems to be the core issue.
2
I wonder whether anyone has dared to try this within the EU, and whether someone has already tried to use GDPR on one of these vendors
This tweet is unavailable
4
3
7
It‘s quite expensive, very hard to introduce unless you do it from the very beginning, and absolutely worth it
3
11
At @INNOQ, we invest a significant amount of time for non-billable work. Company offsites alone (6 per year, 4 of them 2 days, 2 of them 3 days) account for 14 days. We also have lots of internal workshops that people organize themselves, and a lot of additional slack time
1
3
9
Der letzte Absatz ist erschütternd treffend.
1
1
8
Replying to @0xFintech
What? A change in careers or just different channels?
Replying to @bodil @asz
Who isn’t? Seems to be a disease practically everywhere
1
Replying to @bodil
OK, can’t disagree with that