Zukunft heißt Technologie. Bayern ist Marktführer: wir investieren in Digitalisierung, Robotik, künstliche Intelligenz, Hyperloop und Raumfahrt und entwickeln sogar Quantencomputer.
„Wir nennen vor Krieg und Armut Flüchtende 'Asyltouristen', weil wir es auch immer total anstrengend finden, in den Urlaub zu fahren. Und schlimmer als auf der A4 im Stau zu stehen wird so ein Schlepperboot doch wohl nicht sein.“
#empathie#wirsindmehryoutube.com/watch?v=0LvGBe3H…
My prediction is it’ll have hugely positive effects for users’ privacy because, as @clemensv said, it has teeth. I also predict courts won’t follow pointless interpretations that don’t have users’ interests in mind
The current version of the law is unclear and full of holes. It’s like a beta, or possibly an MVP version. We can argue whether we’d be better off with or without it.
I see your point, and I wish it were clearer. But my expectation (and experience) is that judges don’t follow overly literate interpretations. Possibly a EU/US difference?
So far, I’ve been able to get by with asking myself “is this kind of usage something for which I can reasonably be expected to ask for the user’s consent”, given the kind of contractual relationship I already have with them
Agreed. E.g. there are lots of things you shouldn’t log, or at least not keep, which of course complicates things. Keeping aggregated stats instead might work.
I know, I’m not claiming it’s clear or easy to execute. I completely agree with its intention and the general model, though.
Anything specific that comes up in terms of compliance? Always interested in discussing how to go about it technically.