Da musste ich dann doch mal laut auflachen: der-postillon.com/2017/02/be…
5
19
I completely agree these benefits come at a cost, and place an additional burden on the producer. We haven’t found any impressive tooling that helps, unfortunately. I just think they’re absolutely worth it. It’s fine to disagree.
I also think podcasts should have good audio (although this particular episode falls short of that goal). I vastly prefer placing burdens on producers if it has benefits for consumers.
It’s not. It’s removing barriers for consumers, e.g. listeners with hearing problems. Or search engine crawlers :)
1
Like every podcast should, every @case_podcast episode features not only show notes, but also chapter marks and a full text transcript: case-podcast.org
2
7
Excellent question. We’re currently trying to figure this out. Our aim is to license all the tech stuff openly, but retain rights to our own design elements. We’re not completely sure how to do that.
1
I’m not 100% sure why anyone outside of @INNOQ would care, but I think the living style guide created by our web team is quite awesome, and I love the fact we’re able to share it freely innoq.style
5
23
61
I had the chance to talk to the amazing @aantonop about blockchain tech for the @case_podcast, and it got so interesting we kept talking and recorded material for two episodes. This is part 1: case-podcast.org/16-bitcoin
2
34
3
78
I love my colleague @janstepien’s blog post series on using Rust and perceptual hashes to find similar pictures: innoq.com/en/blog/looks-the-…
4
8
It seems a tool for building and collaborating on slides with the source code approach of Reveal and the usability of Keynote will remain a pipe dream forever
3
1
13