At the moment, the transaction fees make it pretty useless for its intended purpose. But if that weren’t the case, why would it not qualify as a currency?
1
As the reward increases in value, spending more on energy makes more commercial sense, thus a lower exchange rate would mean less consumption
1
2
I think Bitcoin is great, and I believe it’s going to revolutionize the way we do finance. Also, it’s not a pyramid or Ponzi scheme, unless you have no idea what those words mean.
But even though I own some BTC, I find the current rise in its value highly problematic.
5
2
13
So AWS releases a single-sign on solution, and it requires Microsoft Active Directory? Or is this an optional integration?
2
1
Ob sich Hyperledger und Ethereum unter eine Abstraktionsschicht packen lassen, kann ich mangels Hyperledger-Kenntnis auch nicht beurteilen. Sonst sieht’s erst mal vernünftig aus, die Idee finde ich ja grundsätzlich prima. Ich hätte dann bei Gelegenheit gerne mal eine Demo :)
1
1
“In many cases this happened because the ‘microservice’ was the largest possible proper interface, but they needed a bigger box.” – Exactly my experience, and the major reasons why I believe we need something larger, such as an SCS hillelwayne.com/post/box-dia… @scsarchitecture
2
11
+1, I had the exact same problem when learning OOP 25 years ago. Lots of real-world examples that weren’t.
Grosse Sprachkunst, feinster Humor – Max Goldt liest seine Texte #srf srf.ch/sendungen/spasspartou…