CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Hat jemand eigentlich schon unsere neue »Arbeiten bei @INNOQ«-Seite bemerkt? innoq.com/de/culture/working… Und auch immer wieder verlinkungswürdig: * innoq.com/de/podcast/014-inn… * innoq.com/de/blog/rollen-bei… * innoq.com/de/blog/familie-un… * innoq.com/de/articles/2016/1…
8
25
So nutzt man die DSGVO für positives Marketing statt Gejammer: privacy.xing.com
8
20
Replying to @gmuecke
Perfect, thanks.
1
Replying to @gmuecke
True. Where did you get the 1.3kW figure from? It’s advertised with 0.98W/Gh, which would yield >13kW for 14TH?
1
Replying to @gmuecke
I may have miscalculated somewhere, but with 2.9GW per second consumption would already be ~25TWh/year, which would be around 0.1% of world energy consumption
1
I talked about this to @aantonop in in a @case_podcast episode, starting at 00:42:04: case-podcast.org/16-bitcoin There’s also a transcript if you don’t want to listen to the whole thing: look for the little icon in the lower right corner of the player (why can’t link to that, FFS?)
The first peer-reviewed study of bitcoin’s energy consumption confirms our fears: Bitcoin’s energy consumption is growing at 20% *per month* and is effectively erasing decades of progress on renewable energy. grist.org/article/bitcoins-e…
1
1
1
“The first peer-reviewed study” is apparently still written by the person who is the single source of this type of information, using a (to me) somewhat questionable method. Surely there must be lots of other people looking into this? Does anyone have additional sources?
The first peer-reviewed study of bitcoin’s energy consumption confirms our fears: Bitcoin’s energy consumption is growing at 20% *per month* and is effectively erasing decades of progress on renewable energy. grist.org/article/bitcoins-e…
1
2
4
Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Auch uns macht die Zusammenarbeit viel Spaß :)
Der neue Shop von breuninger.com auf eigener Plattform ist nun auch in Deutschland online! Feedback wanted! #ecommerce #agile #devops #microservices #scs Danke den Kollegen von @breuninger, @talentformation, @neuland, @inoio_gmbh, @INNOQ für die klasse Zusammenarbeit!
2
6
Replying to @joshbloch
Personally, I am still undecided whether or not this is something worth doing (one way or the other). I do note it’s basically just one person who is the source of basically all reports, but I also note a pretty deafening silence by the enthusiasts
Sticking to standard protocols and formats wherever possible, e.g. using something like Atom for cross-system events
Replying to @joshbloch
Is that really something you believe?
1
Don‘t know whether you’re joking, but it’s actually the successor to DSSSL, which was a Scheme
1
1
I find myself in violent agreement
This tweet is unavailable
3
Here’s a recording of roughly the same talk in English, presented at a different conference: youtube.com/watch?v=RsyOkifm…
1
1
2
Replying to @markusvoelter
Keine Konferenz, eher ein Meetup
1
Replying to @sebroeder @takacsot
An example would a big commercial ESB or EAI or DB product in the center, but the same is true for something like Kafka. I have no objections to using any of these, but not as the long-lived strategy for integration
1
1
Replying to @markusvoelter
Bei der Bahn/DB Systel
1
If your top level architecture diagram includes a product name, even if it’s an open source product, chances are you’re missing something in terms of long-term stability
1
28
3
80
Thanks, much appreciated
Slides for my microservices patterns/antipatterns presentation can be found here speakerdeck.com/stilkov/micr… #agiledev
3
41
3
97