CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
God no. We already had Hi-REST and Lo-REST a decade ago. It was a bad idea back then and it's a bad idea now.
1
There are no RESTful APIs without hypermedia. This is not an optional constraint. A different name might be more appropriate.
Great #RESTful APIs look like they were designed by a single team – read #ZalandoTech's guidelines here: github.com/zalando/restful-a… #REST #API
7
19
2
32
Replying to @JoshuaKerievsky
Quick link to the English version?
Replying to @FrVaBe @dirkweil
Gute Frage, nein: Es gibt diverse JS-UI-Komponenten(-Bibliotheken), die damit zusammenpassen, z.B. jQueryUI. In Zukunft sicher WebComponents
1
1
Replying to @dirkweil
Server-side HTML mit dem Framework Deiner Wahl, Progressive Enhancement auf dem Client. Kein JS-Framework. Besser in >80% aller Fälle
1
2
5
Sehr traurig, dass kein guter Ansatz dabei ist :)
1
While I disagree with the first ”sign“, the rest is pretty good
5 Signs That Your REST API Isn't RESTful. Reminds me of when I had a "Certified SOA" rubber stamp as a joke. dzone.com/articles/5-easy-to…
4
7
6
Great analogy for different as-a-service models: cloud53.co.uk/aas/ (via @phaus)
6
3
I hope whoever runs @YorkshireTea's Twitter account gets a raise
This man is very cross about tea not growing in Yorkshire. Can someone please let him know that everything's OK? He's not listening to us.
1
6
19
Replying to @smeyen
Und Du meinst das verbessert die Welt vielleicht gar nicht?!?
1
Nice touch indeed. And a pretty decent season finale
1
“Fake” bedeutet “gefälscht”, nicht “versehentlich falsch”
1
1
Doof, dass “fake” das auch nicht bedeutet, oder habe ich da die Selbstironie verpasst?
1
1
Mehr zu Cambridge Analytica und der (vermeintlichen?) BigData-Macht: blog.wdr.de/digitalistan/hat… meedia.de/2016/12/05/karrier…
3
3
”Google, democracy and the truth about internet search“ – great article. Really worrying. theguardian.com/technology/2…
1
25
2
26
You might want to calculate again :)
Replying to @timbray @adrianco
My point is not there’s anything wrong with lambda et al, rather that they shouldn’t be your only structuring mechanism
1
2
We definitely don't want to share schemas.
Replying to @adrianco
So for each of my application “parts”, one of these approaches might be the best choice. It’s these parts I’m talking about.
1