@bodil @thattommyhall @bryan_hunter @t_sloughter Yes, I agree. I also don’t see the risk of derivative works.
@bodil @thattommyhall @bryan_hunter @t_sloughter On reading it again, though, I believe I am wrong and there is actually no problem at all.
@bodil @thattommyhall @bryan_hunter @t_sloughter … you might run into problems if you run a publicly accessible service through pm2
1
@thattommyhall @bodil @bryan_hunter @t_sloughter My reading of the AGPL in conjunction with pm2 is: Your own code is not affected, but …
Absolutely mind-blowing essay, both in content and form
1
7
11
”Should Oracle Spring Clean JavaFX?“ – This guy's answer seems to be a pretty clear “yes”. dzone.com/articles/should-or…
3
1
@jeppec @codemonkeyism I find not creating richer JS clients a preferable solution ;-)
1
1
@johnhackworth OK, that makes sense. My understanding is they’re doing this for the backend admin part, not for the publishing itself?
@stonsoftware @mibi61 I’m not a Smalltalk person, but I don’t know of any feature it has that Clojure doesn’t.
2
@StOnSoftware @mibi61 Because of its strong static typing system? :-)
1
(That said, I’m not at all looking forward to the inevitable retweets of tons of folks missing the nuance in that argument)
2
3
I am a big fan of dynamic languages, but this article is worth a read: elbenshira.com/blog/the-end-…
3
51
49
@garybernhardt what do you mean,”once”? Everyone knows that to be true, still
1
@mfeathers analogy works well with covariance and contravariance, too
1
1
“XMLUnit 2.0 is a complete rewrite of XMLUnit that is available for Java and .NET” stefan.samaflost.de/blog/en/…
4
2
@bilalfarooqui @assaf Tweeted text pictures are bad enough, but how can one not include a link to the source with something like this?
@zeevs I completely agree. All religions merit being criticized.
1
1