CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Just in case you needed more proof the US is not a good role model:
Average annual interest on a payday loan in Utah: 482% 45,655 Utahns couldn't pay loans off last year. sltrib.com/news/3044275-155/… #utpol
2
Replying to @rob_knight
@rob_knight Yes, probably. Yet I claim that’s because it does a lot less.
If your business logic is in the client, and you need a backend data API, HTTP is an option. Just don’t call your static URI API “REST”.
5
19
1
12
GraphQL is much better than a bad REST API (the kind that doesn’t merit the name). A real REST API is on a completely different layer.
2
7
8
This:
It really bothers me that all the GraphQL vs REST posts don't even touch on actual REST but instead talk about some convoluted URL scheme.
1
2
1
Replying to @Argorak
@argorak Die Sonos-App tut für mich genau das, was sie soll, sehr gut. Aber halt nur übers Sonos.
I don’t even
NodeJS tip: optimize your code by changing the function comment. medium.com/@c2c/nodejs-a-qui…
4
18
13
Replying to @adactio
@adactio The WHATWG continues to make weird choices
Replying to @adactio
@adactio I always point people to iana.org/assignments/link-re… instead of microformats.org/wiki/existi…. How many link relations registries are there?
1
Replying to @tekener
@tekener Maybe the problem is having an API like this in the first place, and if the client contains all business logic, REST is not for you
Had a fantastic evening with @chillygonzales and the @kaiserquartet 👌 Go see them if you have a chance.
2
Replying to @bodil
@bodil OK, here’s a translation: m.poemhunter.com/poem/the-pa… (Doesn’t do it justice, of course)
Replying to @bodil
@bodil Do you happen to read German? rainer-maria-rilke.de/080027…
1
Looking forward to @chillygonzales and @kaiserquartet in Brussels tonight :)
1
3
Replying to @owolf
@owolf @bodil It looks like satire, so in U.S., the answer to that is probably “yes”
2
Replying to @manuelkiessling
@manuelkiessling No, still on my list. Thanks for the reminder :-)
Even though I love Sorkin’s dialogues, I’m not going to watch a Jobs movie based on that awful Isaacson book
2
Replying to @bodil
@bodil Have you seen the website, openlysecular.org? I mean, WTF?
1
“U.S. corporations lack agency to contractually guarantee privacy” privateinternetaccess.com/bl…
2
I couldn’t agree more: “It feels wrong for books to be ‘exclusive’ to a proprietary software platform.” @gruber at daringfireball.net/linked/20…
3
2