@johanhaleby @tommorris @ewolff but those are comparisons with other encyclopedias. My guess is newspapers are wrong far more often.
I’d bet that Wikipedia is far more often correct than almost any newspaper. Has anybody done research on this yet?
This tweet is unavailable
7
6
7
Dass der BND sich von demokratisch legitimierten Gremien kontrollieren lassen muss, sollte nicht kontrovers sein deutschlandfunk.de/60-jahre-…
3
3
@scottwambler I do this in communities and conferences I’m part of. Here’s a good resource to start: 2012.jsconf.eu/2012/09/17/be…
@scottwambler I find the language excuse pretty lame. They very clearly knew what they’re were saying.
1
2
@scottwambler BTW, I am a conference organizer myself and would have written a post similar to yours a few years ago.
1
1
@scottwambler Saying “we tried, but failed” or “we didn’t try, but will next time” would have been fine IMO.
1
1
1
@scottwambler The first thing is that their responses were a complete disaster. The second that they could have tried to get more proposals.
1
@scottwambler No-one who organizes a conference with international speakers, especially in this domain, can be ignorant of diversity issues.
1
1
1
@scottwambler I’m sure this is well intended, but it’s also wrong. The “local culture” part is a very lame excuse.
1
3
I am absolutely sure it doesn’t fit at all, and it makes me strongly regret to have briefly supported @jdegoes nitter.vloup.ch/moonbeamlabs/sta…
6
Seltsamer Artikel – kein Vorurteil wird entkräftet, und so passen weder Fazit noch Titel. Unter dem sonstigen Niveau
1
@janl (In case that last one sounded passive-aggressive, it wasn’t intended to. Have a good weekend, too.)
. @stevefaulkner @simonstl while true, the less magic your web stack, the easier supporting #a11y becomes (or rather, remains)
4
@aral You’d be right if there was a monopoly, but there clearly isn’t /cc @clemensv
@janl We have different opinions on what “associate” means, then.
1