@rubenverborgh It’s actually a law around here: ico.org.uk/for_organisations…
1
@goldstift I didn’t see them suggest that’s what they will do. Maybe one company-wide email (“don’t do that, dudes”) will suffice, who knows
1
@goldstift It would be if he’d used the @atlassian logo without permission. He likely hasn’t, so it’s only fair they take part of the blame
1
“If you only take one thing away from this talk, make it this: beavers are idiots” – great talk by @tomstuart: codon.com/i-have-no-idea-wha…
3
6
@jeffsussna I don’t agree; I think defining it is the one thing that’s actually quite easy if you spend a few hours with Fielding’s thesis
1
Slightly baffling: “@InfoQ: This article still gets a huge amount of traffic - @stilkov on REST from 2007
bit.ly/1nxLcaf”
3
1
3
Re: Swift, Apple’s interests, according to @gruber, are 1) Apple 2) Apple’s users 3) developers. Everything makes sense once you get this.
5
39
49
Neue Folge unseres Heise-Architektur-Podcasts: @ewolff und ich sprechen über Systemmodularisierung heise.de/developer/artikel/E…
3
9
6
If you don’t get why Apple created its own language instead of using an existing one, you don’t understand much about Apple.
7
15
8
@Meekostuff @mamund @Stephen_Mizell yes, possible, but you’d have to make sure it still works if JS is disabled.
1
@stephen_mizell @mamund Sure, but it’s entirely possible to follow the link to do a page refresh when JS isn’t available or active.
1
@stephen_mizell @mamund Sort of, although I’d argue it’s no longer an SPA if you do that :-)
1
@stephen_mizell @mamund Why not skip the SPA idea altogether and use the most supported, documented, supported hypermedia format (HTML)?
2
1
Just dug up an old @siracusa article from 2010 (when Swift development started), arguing Apple needs a new language arstechnica.com/apple/2010/0…
1
2
4
@tekener Unless you’re bothered by being tied to one platform :-)
1