CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @lrnrd
@ffffux @janl Dankeschön, auch wenn ich bzgl. Punkt 5 (der für mich der entscheidende ist) nicht zustimme.
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage Congrats! Very impressive.
Vorschläge für die @iSAQB-Architekturtage im Oktober hätten @cairolali, @ufried und @ewolff gerne noch bis 19.5.: isaqb-architekturtage.de/inf…
5
2
It’s been a while since I spent some time with CouchDB. Really impressive and fun to use.
1
1
Replying to @FrancescoC
@francescoc @erlangsolutions @ericsson Maybe @joeerl has some hidden family relations
1
1
Replying to @janl
@janl @ffffux Erklärt ihr mir Punkt 7? Ich verstehe ihn nicht.
2
“webkit.js: A port of WebKit to JS aimed at running in both node.js and browsers”. I think my head just exploded. github.com/trevorlinton/webk…
1
8
11
@manuslost Aber Kudos für den Favorite :-)
@manuslost Habe alle Bücher gelesen, aber wer so was schreibt, ist trotzdem ein Arsch. /cc @bitboss
1
“ Think on that for a minute: on torture the New York Times is more cravenly deferent to the CIA than Fox News.” dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014…
1
Replying to @tedneward
@tedneward @bsletten OK, add “… with reasonable effort”
@bsletten @tedneward The Elm debugger allows roll-back, and fix, and roll-forward … I doubt anyone could do that in an imperative language
1
Replying to @owehrens
@owehrens @Argorak @epostdev See? It’s all in good hands.
Replying to @Developmind
@developmind Good example, I guess, thanks.
1
Interesting story about scaling at Tencent China (600M monthly users); but it seems a bit got lost in translation infoq.com/articles/scaling-t…
1
1
2
Replying to @Argorak
@argorak I’m very sure @owehrens and the entire @epostdev team are on it already. Right?
1
Replying to @Argorak
@argorak Safari-User? Kann es damit reproduzieren, aber nicht mit FF oder Chrome.
1
@dl1ely @markusvoelter @ewolff @innoq Not the way I’m referring to. OSS can (and should) be a part of a strategy. If can’t be *the* strategy
@bsletten @tedneward Are you guys talking about the same thing, within seconds of each other?
@dl1ely @markusvoelter @ewolff There’s a difference in the degree of separation. E.g. we do some OSS @innoQ, but it’s mostly tangential
1