@ewolff But it’s the one that already did *everything* a couple decades ago
@dhh Duh. What a surprise. Also, not sure sites that are not about “content” are worth building.
@ewolff I dislike the annotation mapping of controller methods (in JAX-RS neither). Most others seem to have settled on Rails-style routes
1
@ewolff I often recommend it, but it feels a bit dated. Plus, it depends on Spring :-)
2
@janl Wonder whether they were at least honest about their reasons?
1
@aliostad I read it, but tweeting about it would like boasting about stealing candy from toddlers. What were they thinking?
Looking forward to my QCon London track: "Building Integrated Applications with Web Technologies"
qconlondon.com/london-2014/t…
2
1
2
@myfear The “Thin Server” approach is misguided IMO. No need to repeat the mistakes we made on the server once more on the client
1
@myfear Took a brief look, seemed to be the kind of web framework built by people who don’t like the web. I do, so concluded it’s not for me
2
@aniltj Etherpad, installed on a vserver with simple shared basic auth PW?
1
Maybe a modern Java 8/Nashorn/JS, REST/ROCA web framework would make the language tolerable again
2
2
4
@mtnygard Me too! In a Douglas Adams way; “I love the whooshing noise they make as the go by”
1
3