@vaughnvernon In my interpretation, each of my … things … would contain a UI, database, external connectors, and the domain model for a BC.
1
@vaughnvernon @udidahan No, I’m not thinking smaller, more along the lines of executable & self-contained as opposed to a unit of code.
1
@alirizasaral For the moment, don’t assume I want that. Looser coupled than that.
1
@vaughnvernon A strong relation, I agree, but not the same thing.
1
@alirizasaral That includes the front-end part only, doesn’t it? It also implies a front-end integration approach I’m not a fan of
1
@ufried I remember that book, I think. Wasn’t it “Business Components”?
1
Context: You build your system as a collection of small, independent systems, each with its own UI, data, and logic. What do you call them?
22
2
“Right-sized system”, “Not-so-micro-service”. “Service-with-UI”. “Executable Subsystem”. “Sovereign system”. “Independent system”.
1
1
1
“Cohesive system”, “Large enough system”, “Small enough system”. “Logical node”, “Domain unit”, “Bounded system”. “Executable component”.
1
“System”. “Autonomous system”, “Self-contained system”, “Vertical“, “Full-stack service”. “Self-sufficient component”, “Small system”.
“Did the St. Louis police have to shoot Kajieme Powell?” – No. vox.com/2014/8/20/6051431/di…
1
1
SONOS owner problem: Immediately dropping into salesperson mode when asked about one’s experience
3
8
@mwessendorf @goldstift @bitboss Zwei Play:1 reichen als Surround auch völlig.
@mwessendorf @goldstift @bitboss Das beste Gerät, das es von denen gibt, ist der SUB :-)
@bitboss Für meine Ansprüche reicht es, und mit der Convenience ist’s unschlagbar. Röhrenverstärkerconnaisseure werden bestimmt enttäuscht.
@mwessendorf @goldstift @bitboss Aber ich habe allerlei Sonosse und bin extrem zufrieden, daher käme für mich eh nichts anderes in Frage
1