CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Sir Patrick Stewart showing the best #icebucketchallenge performance ever youtube.com/watch?feature=…
1
42
32
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage Much preferable (if feasible), no doubt.
1
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage I recently read a post on the perfect checkout flow. Maybe you should post the text of the perfect autoreply :-)
1
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage If you’re able to answer immediately, that’s of course much better. If it takes you more than a few hours, I prefer the ack
1
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage If the reply is phrased appropriately (i.e. not claiming to be more than letting me know it safely arrived), what’s not to like?
1
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage They show that whoever received them actually uses an issue tracker, for starters
1
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage I think they’re perfectly fine. In fact, I feel they’re an indication that problems are treated professionally.
1
“The Time I Spent On A Commercial Whaling Ship Totally Changed My Perspective On The World”, by Ishmael. Just great. clickhole.com/blogpost/time-…
3
On that naming thing: I know that “Autonomous System” already has a meaning. I still like it, followed by “Self-contained system”. Thoughts?
2
Neue Episode unseres SoftwareArchitekTOUR-Podcasts: @MichaelStal und ich zu „Ressourcen für Softwarearchitekten“ heise.de/-2299439/ftw
3
3
Replying to @johanneswseitz
@ookami86 @kotarak @sarchffm Sure, why not.
1
1
I’ll be giving a talk at the Munich Microservices Meetup on Monday: meetup.com/Microservices-Mee…
3
5
Replying to @dierken
@dierken Yes, that’s what the 12factor.net people use, too. Very generic, though.
1
Replying to @phaus
@phaus I am aware of that article. But you're right, he does.
Replying to @pvblivs
@pvblivs Agreed, that’s what I was trying to say. Apply medicine if you need it, in an appropriate dosage.
1
@nothing_box I agree with you technically. Most people would be confused, though.
Replying to @UdiDahan
@udidahan @jeppec @vaughnvernon That was my understanding from your QCon talk back then, too. Other than that, it’s very close.
Replying to @NeilRobbins
@neilrobbins A very generic term, but sure, it would work.
Replying to @SzymonPobiega
@szymonpobiega both good, but very generic.
1
Replying to @pmolinam
@pmolinam No, long abandoned the idea, for other reasons.