@assaf In the end, I think everyone should be and probably is aware that the VC is going to be the biggest winner.
1
@assaf Either my language skills are lacking or that last tweet was an autocorrect victim.
@janl Sorry, didn’t intend to change context. Just objected to the use of the term “exploit“. Not important, though.
@assaf Yes, that would be my first choice :-) Still don’t see people being exploited. My guess is for close to 100%, it’s a choice they make
1
@assaf I’m not saying PG is doing anything charitable, just that compared to e.g. a job at McDonald’s, it’s clear to me which one I’d take
2
@janl Fine. Was just wondering whether "recon terrifying" has any meaning I’m not aware of.
1
@janl I’m quite confident pretty much everyone in a minimal wage job would disagree with you there. Anyway, let’s just agree to disagree.
1
@janl For a somewhat strange definition of exploitation. Can’t see much reason for feeling sorry for anyone getting funded by YC.
2
@zis_meyer @mtnygard @delitescere I agree; better phrased as “Stop unnecessarily demotivating girls”
1
@pandamonial I’ve read only that stupid tabloid summary, so I’m likely missing something. But aren’t you proving his point with that?
@mtnygard @delitescere He’s certainly right about the need to get girls interested earlier.
1
Finally watched @russolsen’s highly praised “To the Moon!” – clearly one of the best talks I’ve ever seen youtube.com/watch?v=4Sso4Htv…
1
3
28
@clemensv Ungenügende Shopping-Experience (eigentlicher Zweck eines Flughafens)
1