CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @mirko_novakovic
@mirko_novakovic @ufried @findingmarbles Na klar, hat jemand was anderes behauptet? War als inhaltlicher Beitrag gemeint.
Replying to @mirko_novakovic
@mirko_novakovic @ufried @findingmarbles Ich finde alle Sätze, die allgemein etwas über Männer oder Frauen sagen, fragwürdig :-)
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried @findingmarbles Darum geht’s doch gar nicht. Der aktuelle Anteil ist absurd, und dein erster Antwort-Tweet sagt "egal, genetisch"
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried @findingmarbles Für Dich hat alles seine Ordnung – ist schließlich genetisch. Ich kann das nicht leider nicht überzeugend finden.
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried @findingmarbles Außerdem schlägt nun wirklich niemand vor, dass jemand gezwungen werden soll
Replying to @ufried
@ufried @findingmarbles Siehst ja, wie toll das funktioniert.
Replying to @olabini
@olabini I'm sure @owolf will be happy to arrange it
1
@dl1ely @ufried In our company, we have ~5% female tech staff
Replying to @vambenepe
@vambenepe Well, no, but it featured me.
Best thing you're likely to read all day, on minuets: imgur.com/VCOaADq
6
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried Same here. Anecdotal evidence, counts for nothing. But women, in general, are not more or less interested in math or logic than men
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried Which is exactly the point. We don't need to hire more of those who apply, but get more to become interested as kids
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried But whatever, there seems to be no basis to the idea that there is so little interest in IT among females because of genes
Replying to @ufried
@ufried I have a boy and a girl, too. I don't for a second believe they're not treated differently, in more or less subtle ways.
1
Replying to @ufried
@ufried No, I think that's a little too easy.
2
Of the ~60 people attending my talk yesterday, exactly 0 were women. Whatever one thinks the reason is, how can this not be totally wrong?
7
5
3
Replying to @pavlobaron
@pavlobaron No, I'll be gone by then :-)
Replying to @kotarak
@kotarak No point going to sleep in the first place, I guess #redeye
1
@amorgner Excellent, thanks.