@mosesjones I meant: The fact that lots of stuff on the Web isn't REST doesn't invalidate the argument that the Web proves it works
1
@mosesjones I believe we already went through that straw man discussion multiple times.
1
@ctford Yes. Yet IMO, URI templates can be both bad (in docs) and good (in hypermedia responses)
@mosesjones That would very much depend on your Web app. If it's done the way I prefer (see roca-style.org) it's not a misconception
1
@old_nobody I'm in fact no longer as sure as I was of this. It's an interesting discussion when you approach stuff from the hypermedia angle
1
@dierken @georgberky Yes, by far the most common one (even in this thread)
1
A single page app talking to a JSON/HTTP backend is more RESTful than one that “just” uses HTML #notrest
2
1
@old_nobody How would you phrase that as a misconception? And is it a common one?
2
You can tell whether something is RESTful or not by simply looking at the URI #notrest
1
@hhariri I wonder what's with the REST/CQRS incompatibility belief. Where does that come from?
3
@tomayac Well … as long as it's just the very first URL, I'm kind of undecided :-)
1