@groveio Well, yes and no. (Thanks for answering, BTW). Are there some guarantees with regards to the security of the stored messages?
1
@groveio Of course it doesn't – it doesn't talk about the actual *messages* exchanged
2
@vambenepe Walter White doesn't do anything that outrageous in season 1! He just cooks crystal meth. And kills a drug dealer.
1
@groveio, your service seems quite nice, but where can I find information about how you treat my organization's data?
1
Brian McCallister: “Programming any way other than Go’s way, with Go, will be [a] recipe for frustration” skife.org/go/2012/11/18/go_p…
1
Neat list: “The Web engineer's online toolbox” ivanzuzak.info/2012/11/18/th…
1
18
26
Disqualifying the JVM as a viable runtime platform is just as wrong as considering Java as the only possible language to use
1
14
3
@daLizard Nobody "has to", it's just that the JVM (not Java) has many advantages. Can't see what could be wrong with supporting it, too.
@VaughnVernon @szymonpobiega We are very happy with JRuby (and use it for *a lot* of client work)
1
@papproth War mehr ein Scherz :-) Aber danke für das Angebot ;-)
1
@VaughnVernon Unfortunately the answers are still no, n/a, and (mostly) no. I'm confident this will change over time though
1
1
@VaughnVernon I don't know much about Go, but I'd definitely include Python. Clojure is my current favorite.
1
@VaughnVernon Basically almost everything wins against Java from a language perspective these days :-)
@VaughnVernon I guess I'd add verbosity/manifest typing, lack of literals for maps, no closures, no metaprogramming
1
Somebody get me “Unicorns Are Jerks: a coloring book exposing the cold, hard, sparkly truth” for Christmas, please amazon.com/gp/product/147746…
2
4
1
. @cfurmaniak @AdamBien Seriously puzzled how one can *love* Java, honestly. Tolerate, accept, practice, recommend it? OK. But like it? No.
8
4