CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @pavlobaron
@pavlobaron @b_erb And here I thought they formed the basis for Erlang's I/O too
Replying to @pavlobaron
@pavlobaron @b_erb I understand the reasons, but that doesn't make it less strange that almost no one chose the asynchronous path
Replying to @cgrand
@cgrand ah, should have checked
A database of open-source HTTP proxies written in java, and all but one of them threaded? proxies.xhaus.com/java/
2
1
4
Didn't know @cgrand had a ‘real’ implementation of his “A world in a ref” idea: github.com/cgrand/megaref
1
1
2
RT @heisedc: Rails-Girls-Initiative startet durch heise.de/-1704522/ftw (und @innoQ sponsert RailsCologne :-) )
Replying to @pvblivs
@pvblivs @codemonkeyism True.
Replying to @InkmiHq
@codemonkeyism I wish I could say the same.
1
Replying to @InkmiHq
@codemonkeyism Which increases the likelihood that they're good developers drastically
Replying to @InkmiHq
@codemonkeyism Almost as bad as people explaining why only Java is worth knowing without ever having used anything else ...
Replying to @apaipi
. @apaipi I'm sure it's going to be awesome. Too bad it will neither run on my computer, nor produce software for any of my servers
Replying to @ejtweet
@ejtweet They do, yet it's circular: People believe they can by with crap hidden behind APIs
Replying to @sallamar
. @sallamar There's still a large number of people who think a data format or protocol is worth less than a language API that wraps it
1
Replying to @sallamar
@sallamar I believe I share your technical opinion, yet I guess you underestimate the vast number of Java devs who care about standards
2
@mtnygard Or rather, you don't need CQRS if you use Datomic
Replying to @PaulSandoz
@glassfish "JSON-P"? Seriously? I thought that name was taken? //cc @PaulSandoz
1
@stevevinoski @pavlobaron only found them on YouTube
Replying to @pavlobaron
@pavlobaron @stevevinoski Oh. Now that I've listen to a bit of it I know what you mean. That's … eerily close