@dhh ("it" referring to the front door/entry document(s), of course)
@dhh You can include templates for whatever depth you want, make it cacheable and support conditional GET, use it only when deep links 404
@VaughnVernon Probably true - just have a problem seeing any compelling feature, but maybe that's just one more reason to take a closer look
1
What's a good programming language to take a look at over the Christmas break? innoq.com/blog/st/2012/12/ne…
5
4
3
@dhh So the question, in my mind, is whether more useful stuff can be built that relies on HAL than on JSON alone. If so, it's "worthy".
2
@dhh For examples, I think it's good that JSON is a standard. Many libraries and tools and different implementations rely on it
@dhh Would you agree that something is worthy if useful stuff can be built by relying on the standard only?
@nothing_box @ecolix Excellent idea! That's a pretty nice language, much more to my taste than Go
I see statistics about the US population's view on gun control and want to cry. Then I look at my timeline and am able to smile again
@dhh @steveklabnik For all practical purposes, it means "don't hard-code URIs, build them dynamically based on previous responses"
1
1
+1 @janl "My general problem with US politics and finding a middle ground is that the other party is just batshit insane by world standards"
@mikekelly85 @dhh @vlucas @steveklabnik Best way to start a spec by far. Unless it's rejected afterwards because it's a spec :-(
@dhh @mikekelly85 @vlucas @steveklabnik To me, having it even in unstandardized form is better than having no links at all
Awesome! RT @mamund: "Working with Richardson (@leonardr) and Ruby (@samruby) on a new book - "RESTful Web APIs" g.mamund.com/woemw
3
Very cool indeed RT “@jcfischer: absolut schwerelos “@slartbart: Schwerelos #wahnsinn
youtube.com/BZwNLWgsUMg (via 20min)””
2
3