@codemonkeyism Totally unhelpful, I know, but would does WYSIWYG even mean for Web editing these days?
Via a tweet I can't find right now, stumbled across this awesome talk about Tor and censorship from last year's 28C3: youtube.com/GwMr8Xl7JMQ
2
6
@fogus While this may be justified, I don't get what would be wrong with making it harder for those maniacs to do harm
Back from discussing company strategy with the other @innoQ folks. Always a fun part of the year.
1
Doesn't really make sad that Noir is deprecated blog.raynes.me/blog/2012/12/…
2
@aliostad It's just words. You could also talk about rendering XML or JSON :-)
1
@aliostad I typically don't. What I send back is a representation of the URI that's shown in the address bar.
@aliostad I understand your point now. I still disagree: (the right kind of) HTML is not view code, and HTML+CSS+JS offers a very nice SoC
2
@aliostad @darrel_miller I disagree. You haven't explained why you think so yet.
1
This is how you do it RT @ThoMo1969: Mach ich so ähnlich, um mich warm zu spielen ... nur ohne Ball ;) stefan-graf.com/best-of-kick… - unbelievable
5
2
Finally :-) @rushtheband: "We are honored to be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame..." full statement: rush.com/rock-and-roll-hall-…
@jacobfahrenkrug @owehrens If that's a use case, sure. I'm not sure whether your labels are just that - labels - or resources of their own