CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
All of @innoQ relocating again for three days, this time to Flueli-Ranft in Switzerland innoq.com/blog/st/2012/09/in…
1
Replying to @owehrens
@owehrens POST to ./labels to add one, PUT with a list of labels to replace them
1
Replying to @owehrens
@owehrens Depends on what your model actually is, but how about adding a label via POST to .../labels/ ?
1
This is actually a very impressive list of (mostly) unobtrusive JavaScript components bootstraphero.com/the-big-ba…
9
19
Very proud to be sponsoring Rails Girls Rheinland, 1+2 March 2013 - apply now! railsgirls.com/rheinland (via @railsgirls)
9
1
Replying to @mtnygard
@mtnygard Anyone who ever met @adrianco? :-)
1
And now I find myself referencing an @mtnygard talk on a conference call he's actually part of. Weird.
Replying to @mtnygard
@mtnygard Pay attention instead, please :-)
What kind of reporting is that? Embarrassing. @colin_jack: Bradley nanning as person of the year guardian.co.uk/world/blog/20…
Replying to @pavlobaron
@pavlobaron @stevevinoski Any particular album you'd recommend?
I don't think I want to be around when "that baby" "erupts" :-) RT @InfoQ: Silverlight Unplugged bit.ly/UrBj94
1
Replying to @mbohlende
@mbohlende Olle Kamellen, machen wir seit Jahren :-)
1
Replying to @pvblivs
@pvblivs @owehrens You're welcome, nice discussion.
Replying to @wycats
@wycats @mikekelly85 I'm all for a pragmatic, real life-oriented JS layer, but I'd hate to see the declarative Web given lower priority
1
Replying to @wycats
@wycats Same spirit as @mikekelly85's question: What would be your position on the "classical" Web model (Unobtrusive JS etc.) in the TAG?
2
2
Replying to @DesignedByBlind
@DesignedByBlind Wir sollten dazu unbedingt eine Episode machen :-)
1
Replying to @DesignedByBlind
@DesignedByBlind Das ist sicher ein guter Punkt. Ich habe noch nie darauf geachtet, ob populäre JS-MVC-Frameworks das tun
Replying to @DesignedByBlind
@DesignedByBlind Oh, warum nicht? Semantisches HTML ist ja nun keine hinreichende, aber doch schon eine notwendige Bedingung?
2
Replying to @bitworking
@bitworking @sallamar @dret I too dislike versioning in media types, but not as much as breaking every URI when a major version changes
1
1
Replying to @wscherphof
@wscherphof That sucks indeed.
1