@iceX33 @vdandre Disagree, both easily addressed with unobtrusive JS
. @vdandre Good question. Offline client? Games? Media players & editors?
3
@cibrax I'm not sure that's true, but even if it were, so what? One time, most people did SOAP and WSDL.
. @karlkrukow Independent of the implementation. See roca-style.org for my preferred approach.
1
1
8
To explain that last tweet: I consider Single Page Apps and JS/client-centric Web apps a "wrong idea" in most scenarios. YMMV.
10
9
5
@bertschneider I don't care much for the SPA approach in the first place
So, AngularJS seems to be a very neat implementation of the wrong idea. But it's definitely interesting and worth a closer look.
5
5
3
@logosity @mfeathers Me too. Plus, its sole instance, with the world as its transitive closure, was "thrown" if something went wrong.
1
@BenWagener Ich glaube, dass ge-gziptes semantisches HTML da prima funktioniert. Aber natürlich passt ROCA nicht für Offline-Szenarien
1
@BenWagener Mit Caching und 304 juckt mich das in der Regel weniger als mich die Alternative schmerzt
1
@enterprise_geek Congrats :-) if they only knew what you *really* think about this language ...
This ROCA stuff is important to me, so allow me to retweet @InfoQ: REST and Hypermedia, ROCA, WebSockets vs. HTTP bit.ly/11T7ULE
3
2
11
@YvesGoeleven @smarx @clemensv @xpaulbettsx Fine, but I guess that would not mean what you think it does: new version of the resource itself
@sgrasmann @mdennis @kellabyte @faltering Old but still good article by @iansrobinson that elaborates on that idea: martinfowler.com/articles/co…
3