:-))))) RT @mwessendorf: ROFL!!! RT @DasHirnederl: #protip: be careful what you copy/paste bit.ly/GBvioL
17
Very nice collection, but not frontend-focused RT @justinsheehy @stilkov You may be interested in dropwizard.codahale.com/
1
4
6
@struberg Again, does not match my experience. Agree though that it's kind of a necessity to follow framework upgrades as soon as possible
. @AbuSofiane @Sadache Play is really cool, but I would only use it if I were using Scala.
@stevendick Won't fit in 140 characters; will follow up with blog post Real Soon Now
@struberg Yes. Not my experience at all, works well after several years.
2
@codemonkeyism I strongly disagree. We both make money if we (help) make the right long-term decisions.
@codemonkeyism I'm not sure I know what your recommendation would be. What's your stack of choice in 2012?
@codemonkeyism And I totally dig and support their move to Scala, absolutely consistent and business-savvy
@codemonkeyism I agree, best thing I saw so far. Very Rails-inspired :-) But in a positive sense, and with a good feel in Java
@codemonkeyism I can tell you so many stories about fucked up Java projects. Or any language. Proving what, exactly?
After a bit of research, my verdict on the most productive Java Web framework is … drop Java and go with JRuby/Rails if you need the JVM.
8
47
12
But I bet you got a lot of pixels in return RT @jimwebber: @stilkov just cost me a bunch of money.
RT @debasishg: For JDK 10 or after, a fundamental change is being discussed: making the Java language Object Oriented prsm.tc/eWX98v
1
11
3
@jimwebber Thought about the same yesterday, but what's the point of postponing the inevitable?
1
@dhanji Sitebricks seems to be quite neat, docs leave quite a bit open to imagination, though. Any plans to change this? /cc @mwessendorf
1
@bjelline Damn, procmail dies on some emails on our system. Try stefan at tilkov dot de