@alblue I know, which is why it would be great if Rails drove one standard format
@mrreynolds first 6 episodes were pretty much OK. Unsatisfactory Lost-style ending guaranteed, though, as it's been cancelled.
OK, here's something to complain about (possibly): Ideally, the patch format should not be Rails-specific ... haven't checked that yet.
1
And in the interest of balance ... :-) RT @ryah: "Rails to use PATCH instead of PUT" Http nerds annoy me
1
I have nothing to complain about, surprising myself RT @obie: Say hello to HTTP PATCH in Rails 4 weblog.rubyonrails.org/2012/…
1
1
1
Schön, wenn die taz ab und an mal wieder richtigen Schwachsinn publiziert, das rückt mein Weltbild wieder gerade taz.de/Kommentar-Gauck-und-T…
Very true, one very smart person gone way too soon RT @MichaelStal: Over 7 years have gone since Mario Jeckle died - sad!
@stevendick Seemed to me that with that price tag, that was kind of unnecessary
@wfaler As I user, I want to be able to think in terms of individual things that I can bookmark, link to, tweet about … not applications
1
2
@wfaler Things with URIs are what make up the Web. The separation of an information space into resources should be independent of formats.
@wfaler Because the Web's original innovation is to treat content and transactions as the same thing from a client perspective.
@wfaler It's exactly making that distinction that I believe is the wrong approach … /cc @myfear @engelschall
@engelschall Couldn't disagree more :-) Single-page on the client is just as bad as a stateful server app was back then
1
1
1