CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Done with my #onedaytalk Cloud session; fun as usual
Replying to @AdamBien
@AdamBien We all know that beauty is a relative concept :-)
Second try for Yegge's Google rant, this time with the right link plus.google.com/112678702228…
1
4
LOL "Dialing Security to zero can still get you a reasonably successful product such as the Playstation Network." plus.google.com/112678702228…
2
Replying to @AdamBien
@AdamBien I'll cram 67 into 60 minutes. Also as usual :-)
1
Replying to @hseeberger
. @hseeberger Even though I do like both the Isolator/Actor and the optional typing/type errors as warnings approaches
I'll be speaking at #jbossoneday tomorrow: onedaytalk.org/index.php/pro…. I will have slides :-) //cc @AdamBien
1
1
Replying to @hseeberger
. @hseeberger #dart seems to be very Google-centric, not very innovative, not too much of an improvement over either Java or JavaScript
Replying to @KevlinHenney
@KevlinHenney Sweet, a SAX event- emitting C parser. That could be useful in filling up an XML database for quality analysis :-) #astroarch
After some more time spent with #dart, I've made up my mind and decided to join the skeptics. I don't believe this will become relevant.
1
6
1
Replying to @roidrage
@roidrage @mrreynolds Was that a intended as a recommendation?
1
Sad, me too—any alternatives except Gmail? @mrreynolds: …and there goes my MobileMe IMAP. Looks like this iCloud rollout is in full effect.
1
Replying to @RomanStanek
@RomanStanek IMO, just more evidence everybody outside Apple knows jack shit about their reasons
Replying to @swannodette
@swannodette @thoefer I'd be more than glad to be proven wrong
@thoefer I believe ClojureScript will only ever be adopted by those who use Clojure already; I'm intrigued, but uncertain about its future
1
#Dart seems to be a somewhat boring language, but maybe that's the point dartlang.org/articles/idioma…
19
5
Replying to @InkmiHq
@codemonkeyism As usual, I'm not disagreeing on the essence of your actual point - it's all a matter of wording
Replying to @InkmiHq
@codemonkeyism If every class had its own thread of control, yes, "no locking" - in the sense that the programmer doesn't lock
2
Replying to @pavlobaron
. @pavlobaron Exactly - when people claim "no locking", they refer to the lack of manual locks, (usually) not the absence of deadlocks
1
1
1