CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Sitting on a train, watching somebody boot Windows XP. Did this always take about 4-5 minutes? Incredible.
4
2
Replying to @poutsma
@poutsma not cynical enough? :-)
LOL yeah, a date between @innoQ and @mrreynolds “@Sharas_: @stilkov sounds like a dating advert”
innoQ needs more bloggers. Especially of the young, enthusiastic, handsome kind. With the occasional cynicism thrown in.
3
Excellent complement to Isaacson's Jobs biography: The two 5by5 episodes (42 & 43) with @siracusa 5by5.tv/hypercritical/42 5by5.tv/hypercritical/43
2
Done with my talk on large-scale architecture at #iSAQB information day
Replying to @dankurka
@dankurka I don't find this particularly convincing. Do you? Whatever, time will tell.
1
Replying to @alexkli
@alexkli I agree; I think Dart comes from the same mindset.
Rumor has it GWT is dead. Seems again that trying to “simplify” the Web by hiding it is a sure way to ensure failure. plus.google.com/105933370793…
6
43
9
Replying to @dret
@dret You are absolutely right. F*ck. I just don't know what Reader is subscribing to. It surely isn't this Atom feed.
I'm not at #QCon. This sucks.
1
Replying to @nzkoz
@nzkoz You can, with some justification, view the time lag & decoupling as a minor technical detail
Replying to @nzkoz
@nzkoz Not sure I agree. The website is a means of acquiring lenders. Stop that and you won't be able to fund anything in the future.
Replying to @nzkoz
@nzkoz I don't know; seems to be the only reasonable way to set things up. Wouldn't call this a sham
1
Interesting discussion on the Google API style: plus.google.com/u/0/11814824…
1
4
Now that's what I call a convincing product pitch: youtube.com/watch?v=2V9-g8Ju…
7
3
Replying to @bitworking
@bitworking why is that a separate document? What's the conceptual difference to an out-of-band WSDL?
1
Replying to @bitworking
@bitworking I'm concerned with the URI-as-API approach. Don't you see this as a problem?
2
Replying to @tastapod
. @tastapod It's very simple: There's no such thing as a "REST URI". There are just URIs.