@viktorklang But the Java interfaces need to be defined up front. Clojure advocates a wide, generic, uniform interface for everything.
@viktorklang True. In all fairness, though, Rich's remarks were probably targeting Java rather than Scala
“@jcfischer: Good reading on the Gawker security disaster http://j.mp/ebV5jk (via @gruber)"
4
4
@RomanStanek to be fair, they've been calling it that for ages, long before I first heard Cloud Computing
RT @raganwald: Hackers paying thousands for discontinued Nokia 1100 handsets http://bit.ly/eZxJKb #fb
4
@robdiana I believe it's basically undoable - e.g. R and Lua and Groovy are used in vastly different contexts
Good list of next generation XML proposals RT @karlpro http://my.opera.com/karlcow/blog/new-xml-generation
3
+1 to Tim Wu: "Since when are you in the business of deciding who and who isn't a good civil disobedience movement?'" http://n.pr/glw4nR
2
@ewolff The "rise" of scheme seems particularly unbelievable :-) I'd believe the Clojure numbers, but I don't think they mean anything
For comparison, @elharo's XML 2.0 suggestions: http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/xml-2-0/
1
+1, unsure about lack of namespaces RT @james_clark: MicroXML. My take on an HTML5-friendly minimalist subset of XML http://bit.ly/g4AImx
1
“Programming languages to watch in 2011
http://ow.ly/1rXNvL” -- Probably only Gartner reports are less useful than these kinds of analyses
2
2
Pretty cool RT @svenfuchs: whoops! open nitter.vloup.ch and log in. then hit j, j, j, j, k, k, k, k ... who knew?
3
4
@stilkov In fact I'm occasionally quite frustrated by having a written a book most experts in the community can't criticize
@roidrage +1 on the different target markets. As mentioned, doing English first, then translate is probably the sweet spot