@pautasso Looking forward to getting my hands on that paper. Care to write an article for InfoQ about the topic?
1
my question is answered already: http://blog.heroku.com/archives/2009/4/24/commercial_launch/#comment-8640986
1
@martin_probst Agreed - $740/month for 16 parallel nodes seems expensive. Hard to say whether the added value is worth it.
via @rtomayko : Heroku pricing: http://heroku.com/pricing -- Heroku, in case you don't know, is the coolest thing since sliced bread for RoR
1
@kohlerm Interesting – I always mention SAP as one of the companies that doesn't do REST yet. It seems I need to update my prejudice :)
@timbray in 1995, CPU clock rate was ~100MHz – I somehow doubt our problems now are 70 times harder. Way to go without parallelism …
Final verdict on #jax09: Well worth a visit. I'd still prefer more English talks/international speakers. Who needs presentations in German?
@atmanes #jax09 attendance was roughly equal to last year's, I guess. No crisis-related problems, it seems …
Back from #jax09. Great discussions, long chance to talk to @greggpollack (who gave an excellent talk on Rails 3 in the evening).
I agree with each and any of Cay Horstmann's guesses regarding the future of Sun products: http://tinyurl.com/d3y7zp
@greggpollack will present tonight at Düsseldorf on Rails: http://tinyurl.com/b4h3dc
RT @infoq Presentation: Mark Nottingham's HTTP Status Report http://bit.ly/MucE5 – excellent entertainment for REST/HTTP geeks
1
@rainer198 Because the guys who did that article didn't know what they were talking about.