now that many VC firms call everyone a partner, it's become much harder for entrepreneurs to figure out who can make a funding decision.

Jul 13, 2014 · 10:55 PM UTC

8
31
81
Replying to @sama
@sama founding partner would be my bet. @pmarca is a16z transparent about this?
2
@erikb @pmarca a16z clearly differentiates between partner and GP; founders figure it no problem
1
1
Replying to @sama
@sama well it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the guy fresh from 1 year at McKinsey probably doesn't call the shots
1
Replying to @sama
@sama also just check their fundraising prospectus. VCs don't generally lie to their LPs
Replying to @sama
@sama agreed. a16z are particularly bad at this, makes job titles meaningless.
1
Replying to @sama
@sama entrepreneurs will need to learn how to determine buying/investing power without titles, a skill that is useful in many other areas
1
Replying to @ben_mathes
@ben_mathes @sama wall street titles are standardized so everyone knows an Investment Banking VP = MBA + 3-6 yrs. Not so with VC "partners".
Replying to @ben_mathes
@ben_mathes @sama VC titles will likely stabilize too. We're just going through an inflationary period.
Replying to @sama
@sama the entire funding process is opaque. Favors those who can navigate it; not necessarily indicator of company quality.
1