surprising trend: for years it felt like a substantial fraction of the most impressive tech founders were under 28 or so. in the past few years, very few of them are. what changed?

Sep 17, 2022 · 8:48 PM UTC

462
125
77
1,928
(i think crypto is part of the story, but definitely not all of it)
17
5
1
183
Replying to @sama
Only a small segment of Gen-X/Millennials [brightest, with the right pedigree, at the right institutions] have been breaking through. Now the rest of us are reaching the traditional age, when pre-tech entrepreneurs began building. #ThirtySomething
3
Replying to @sama
They aged
1
Replying to @sama
ummmm maybe they had a few birthdays????? WHAT DO YOU THINK HAPPENED?? PEOPLE DONT MAGICALLY STAY UNDER 28 FOREVER BUDDY
6
Replying to @sama
I 110% believe it's cost of living in the US plus other other factors making it riskier to go without a job for an extended period
1
Replying to @sama
Substantial seed and pre-seed funding is more abundant, esp for experienced operators. That makes it easier for people with families to make the jump.
1
Replying to @sama
The whole idea of “30 under 30” is about young people stumbling upon a great idea & hitting a jackpot. But there are statistically more number of successful entrepreneurs who come from experience => its riskier to invest in young geniuses & land yourself an Elizabeth Holmes.
2
Replying to @sama
Those kinds of people lean toward being “influencers” now. Same result with less work.
1
2
Replying to @sama
Resonating. Hard problems are hard to solve. Ingenuity helps but the wisdom to navigate harder problems might sway towards experience @aki_ranin
1
1
Replying to @sama
The easy wins in software (bits) are harder to find. Hard science innovation aka deep tech (atoms) is having a renaissance. Launching a deep tech startup typically requires a PhD. Median age of a PhD recipient is early 30s.
2