surprising trend: for years it felt like a substantial fraction of the most impressive tech founders were under 28 or so. in the past few years, very few of them are. what changed?

Sep 17, 2022 · 8:48 PM UTC

462
125
77
1,928
(i think crypto is part of the story, but definitely not all of it)
17
5
1
183
Replying to @sama
Immigration got harder
8
Replying to @sama
No one over 28 was into tech.
5
Replying to @sama
Higher barrier of entry. You need more knowledge than before to be able to compete with established companies and that takes time. Being a genius programmer is no longer enough as your software needs to do 100 things to be competitive.
7
Replying to @sama
Not a wild west environment anymore? More of a regulated and administered terrain?
3
Replying to @sama
The 28 year old founders got older and did not stop being founders. Guilty as charged
4
Replying to @sama
You got older 😅
1
1
31
Replying to @sama
One theory is that influence and money is concentrated around successful founders. Why take the risk of funding a first time founder when there are more and more second and third time founders with a proven track record? Or more founders are ex-Uber etc instead of newly grads?
17
Replying to @sama
That suggests the pre 94 demographic cohort is more productive — which is prior to internet native being the default cultural upbringing. Perhaps the utility of straddling multiple cultural realities makes for more capable founders.
9
Replying to @sama
People being increasingly aware that era was simply a bunch of wealthy folks cultivating bright young workaholics. They transplanted the finance model to tech, and moved the cult of personality to the founder.
1
21
Replying to @sama @founderannie
20-30 years ago, building tech used to be relatively simple compared to today. i.e. solutions didn’t have huge amounts of functionality, the UI wasn’t pretty, security wasn’t a huge problem, no need for 24/7 uptime. Modern solutions require much more time, effort and resources.
1
7