surprising trend: for years it felt like a substantial fraction of the most impressive tech founders were under 28 or so. in the past few years, very few of them are. what changed?

Sep 17, 2022 · 8:48 PM UTC

462
125
77
1,925
(i think crypto is part of the story, but definitely not all of it)
17
5
1
183
Replying to @sama
That was an untapped market and their needs were unmet until funding. Now you will only see that kind of growth from a new untapped market from a different founder type that was also underfunded by investors (and thus choked off their most ambitious still unsolved problems).
1
Replying to @sama
I’d guess lower willingness to take risks due to the rising costs of housing, food, etc
15
Replying to @sama
Probably control. Those who succeed don't want competition and fixed it so they are the only ones.
Replying to @sama
toC -> toB
Replying to @sama
The smartphone revolution which enabled many of these tech companies is on the maturing side of the lifecycle. It will come back around again when the next enabling tech favors quick decisions and new thinking with fewer hard skill requirements.
Replying to @sama
very confident this is the answer: the opportunity cost of starting a startup increased. Top tech companies have vacuumed most of tech-minded working class talent. And can you blame them (me)? the risk adjusted returns of wage labor is simply much higher.
Replying to @sama
My humble POV. Stuff is getting so much more costly. Risk appetite has reduced due to macro economic situations.
Replying to @sama
Maybe exploring the possibility of starting your own businesses entered the minds of more seasoned professionals as startup culture was normalised. We just have a wider range of founders now!
Replying to @sama
Without looking at other responses, generational waves, timing. Maybe this observation helps explain superstitions like the Chinese Zodiac 12 year cycle.
Replying to @sama
You got older.
1