traditional interviews are remarkably bad ways to make hiring decisions

Aug 2, 2022 · 2:57 PM UTC

169
104
27
2,009
Replying to @sama
What's your favorite alternative?
4
Replying to @sama
Same can be said about getting into YC
Replying to @sama
The hiring managers, at the “scrappiest” “entrepreneurial” “startup mentality” big companies don’t have the ability to find all-star candidates. And it makes sense in terms of efficiency, not a big deal/real problem to solve. Not everything needs to be run like a startup imo.
1
Replying to @sama
What interview types have you seen work really well and for what type of position?
Replying to @sama
Yes. It’s almost designed for churn: *create a huge painful barrier to get into a company w/ the most vital factor to happiness intro’d at very end (the manager) *no incentive to leave before 12 mo mark. *huge benefit to “trade up” once you establish yourself.
1
1
24
Replying to @sama
yes-and, a remarkably bad way to find a job.
Replying to @sama
How would Sam interview another Sam for a junior position?
Replying to @sama
Studies show the best way to hire is: - Select for intelligence and conscientiousness - Multiple rounds of structured interviews with rubrics for scoring - Skill tests that simulate on the job duties as accurately as possible Yet we're addicted to informal behavioral interviews
1
3
Replying to @sama
What would be a step in the right direction in place of this?
Replying to @sama
When can I try to game the AI?