traditional interviews are remarkably bad ways to make hiring decisions

Aug 2, 2022 路 2:57 PM UTC

169
104
27
2,011
Replying to @sama
Let them join the organisation and prove their skills there task by task
1
2
Replying to @sama
first the ai came for my summarization abilities and i said nothing then it came for my ability to have a conversations like a human and i said nothing then it came for my ability to create trippy pictures based on a random sentence and i said nothing now my interviewing?! wtf
4
2
117
Replying to @sama
Any ideas from what you鈥檝e seen on good ways? We鈥檙e in a growth phase.. and keen to hire well
1
Replying to @sama
Think verified twitter bios should be the 22 resume. @verified should start this as a paid service so people can just point their prospective employer to their twitter bio. Employer can also check their tweet social history. They save time & kill two birds in one stone.
1
1
Replying to @sama
True- 1.Proof of work is not established via conversation. 2.The cultural fit is also not established. 3. Would he become a part of the mission of the organisation. So all above can鈥檛 be identified via normal interview
3
4
Replying to @sama
Flohiring.com is using AI to match developers to job with code. Early results show good outcomes when you match devs by the code they write not normal interviews.
2
3
Replying to @sama
conversations are the highest-bandwidth most widely-accessible form of communication we鈥檝e got. Interviews are terrible, but better than anything else we have (more to a great team-mate than just assessing hard skill). Let鈥檚 make them better! We鈥檙e leveraging @OpenAI to do so.
9
Replying to @sama
I have seen a shift towards having the person *do* the job in some way, vs. talk about it (and getting paid for it). More time consuming, but better for both sides, assuming neither has anything to hide and all parties want to work at a company that hires well.
1