Fully remote global is a luxury vs Hybrid/In-office.

I would probably be more afraid of the remote team if I assumed that the best minds would flexibly join forces internationally. But honestly, I'm missing the "I don't care" option.

Apparently 25% of your followers work remotely.

None of the above, I’d be more concerned with who they have and what they can do. Remember, you could have a dozen of capable people, or you could have #johnwick with a pencil, I know which one I’d be more worried about.

great question

Forever bullish on IRL

Sam, competition is healthy. Assess your technology and competitive strategies (SWOT), their weaknesses, and up your game. Get your crew onboard before you make any change; you might have to outsmart the competition but don't let them drive you to increase spending.

please quit or be sacked from openai, people say gpt-3 is "tricks". we do not want another steven jobs to tell the engineering world what to do

Definitely fully remote. That means they have access to talent from anywhere + any associated cost advantages.