thought experiment: you have a startup. you hear about a new startup with smart, dedicated founders that is going to compete with you. are you most nervous if they are
25% fully remote
14% in person 3 days a week
61% fully in person
31,070 votes • Final results

Aug 1, 2022 · 4:31 PM UTC

181
115
88
676
Replying to @sama
What matters more is whether the team culture is motivating or toxic
1
Replying to @sama
Not relevant. All I’d care about is the quality of the founders and their plan.
1
6
Replying to @sama
Being curious here - How does the location matter in 2022? My thoughts: 1. IMO competition doesn't change if you work remotely or in person. 2. As a founder, I try to be authentic and address the needs of my customers and community. That is how I escape competition.
1
3
Replying to @sama
In person if all other variables are the same, which is impossible
Replying to @sama
all-remote, nobody in person
1
Replying to @sama
If their location matters in how you see your future ability to dominate your space...you're screwed either way.
8
1
142
Replying to @sama
Brand new? Fully in person. Fully remote won't last, hybrid is a sign they're just following the crowd and probably not going to innovate.
1
Replying to @sama
Fully Remote + founders regularly meet up to plan + strategize monthly.
1
6
Replying to @sama
I think @jasoncwarner got a lot of points right here:
Ok, let's actually talk remote/hybrid/in-office work for tech (not VCs) There are likely some better suited to talk about this than me though the number isn't high, particularly execs. Been remote since 2010 for Canonical (started in Australia), Heroku & GitHub (Victoria)
7