i suspect that to fully understand the universe, we need AGI in a similar way to needing a telescope to understand galaxies our unaided faculties are not good enough, and we need better tools--or in this case, smarter tools--to help us make sense of reality

Jul 27, 2022 · 6:08 PM UTC

94
79
18
822
also, i think AGI is probably necessary for humanity to survive--our problems seem too big to solve for us to solve without better tools :( it's always hard to think about what tools will enable, but i cannot begin to imagine what we'll be able to achieve with the help of AGI
36
31
12
367
Replying to @sama
“Fully understand”? Gödel would like to have a word with you.
7
Replying to @sama
makes sense
1
3
Replying to @sama
it'd b better 4 all involved if u were 2 have these questions cleared (beforehand) by your elite (instead of eg the money-power-people, who r beholden 2 the Mammon + will sell u out)
2
Replying to @sama
What if some people such as myself already have understood the universe, and written about it, but people like you are not listening or understanding? LOL github.com/v5ma/selfawarenet…
1
3
Replying to @sama
True. But if we shouldn’t feed the agi with our assumptions and theories about Big Bang, dark matter and energy, etc. Better that it looks at raw data and theorizes from there
2
Replying to @sama
I apsolutely agree with you dear Sam Altman @sama #SamAltman. Thereupon I am asking you to work hard so we can have AGI asap. #ElonMusk #NASA #JoeRogan 😇🙏
1
1
Replying to @sama
and we need more powerful super computers that allow us to take more advantage of the power of AGI
2
Replying to @sama
🤦‍♀️ enough with the AGI hyperbole. The Dude seriously needs someone in his life to call bullshit
2
Replying to @sama
Thats the synopsis of Blind Lake. It could lead to some unintended consequences
2
Replying to @sama
We need to understand how the telescope works to best interpret what we see through it. Even just building AGI will teach us about our own perspective lens through which we observe reality.
3