What are we currently missing but is going to seem obvious in retrospect about the implications/significance of negative interest rates?

Jan 10, 2020 · 1:50 AM UTC

213
101
62
907
Replying to @sama
Fintech will have been an obvious bet. Banks and payments, especially, take advantage of an expanding money supply and the accumulation of productivity gains across sectors.
1
Replying to @sama
The IRS tax system will crash when it starts processing 1099-INT's with negative values that generate negative tax bills. Banks will similarly have problems when the checks for negative amounts start clearing.
Replying to @sama
The common argument is that people hunt for yields and capital flows to riskier assets. But if you look at Japan most household assets are still in the form of cash despite -ve rates, few people invest and there is a problem of unproductive cash building up.
1
2
Replying to @sama @StephenPiment
Negative interest rates will lead to the nationalization of the banking industry.
1
4
Replying to @sama
Banks charging for deposits = less deposits = less money to lend = credit tightening in the lending markets perhaps?
1
Replying to @sama
A true risk-free rate should naturally be negative as there is no such natural supply of it (deflation is natural) and thus is a service to be paid for.
Replying to @sama
That the Cantillon-Effect will accelerate the radicalisation of politics across the globe even more...
1
Replying to @sama
It was "Bait and switch scheme"
Replying to @sama
Good one. Maybe: Positive real returns aren't enough
Replying to @sama
Modern monetary theory claims that this is the new normal en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode…
1