can you elaborate on that?
1
A triple in the graph is a fact regardless of anything else. You need 4D ontology or n-ary relates or event based modeling or ... Can't annotate existing triples to do the same thing. (Sim. its an antipattern in LPG)
3
4
How can it be anything more than a proclamation by its author/publisher/etc.?
1
Do those things all have a responsibility to maintain the context in which each assertion was originally found, i.e. who asserted it?
1
I agree that a random RDF file found on the web should not in general be considered as a claim by whoevever "owns" that file (for some definition of "owns"). .../...
1
However, the question of monotonicity is orthogonal to that. Any RDF file makes a set of statement, and entails every subset of these statements. .../...
2
2
If a fact-checker quotes somebody else's statements as an RDF graph, this RDF graph should comply with RDF's monotoic semantics, whether they endorse it or not. Otherwise, they are misquoting.

May 12, 2022 · 9:08 AM UTC

1