Right - temporal modelling, or any form of conditional truth, should not be done as simple adornment of a triple. Violates monotonicity.
1
can you elaborate on that?
1
A triple in the graph is a fact regardless of anything else. You need 4D ontology or n-ary relates or event based modeling or ... Can't annotate existing triples to do the same thing. (Sim. its an antipattern in LPG)
3
4
How can it be anything more than a proclamation by its author/publisher/etc.?
1
Do those things all have a responsibility to maintain the context in which each assertion was originally found, i.e. who asserted it?
1
I agree that a random RDF file found on the web should not in general be considered as a claim by whoevever "owns" that file (for some definition of "owns"). .../...
1
However, the question of monotonicity is orthogonal to that. Any RDF file makes a set of statement, and entails every subset of these statements. .../...

May 12, 2022 · 9:06 AM UTC

2
2
If a fact-checker quotes somebody else's statements as an RDF graph, this RDF graph should comply with RDF's monotoic semantics, whether they endorse it or not. Otherwise, they are misquoting.
1