Replying to @Gkellogg
Considering only the syntax, N-Triples may be extended with the <<...>> construct just like in Turtle*, no?
1
You would still have one triple per line; just some of them are metadata triples. What you mean by "llrC"?
1
Replying to @Gkellogg
I'm assuming @olafhartig 's idea is to duplicate the <<...>> expression in each triple where it is involved. Much redundancy, but again, N-Triple is already very redundant.

May 19, 2019 · 12:07 AM UTC

1