copyright law doesn't require a 'real name'. i have registered several of my works under a pseudonym already in fact.
you have, check who git thinks the author of that code is. it's explicitly called out in the kernel's DCO too.
1
'PaX' isn't an entity can own copyright. mentioning it is at best a courtesy (appreciated), but it's not copyright acknowledgement.
1
you're not answering the question. do you feel guilty of copyright violation? you should be, and it's not the only commit.
1
he got full credits in the patch where i added his code which is how and where i credit anyone else, be that bugreports or actual code.
2
1
did you publish copyrighted code attributing it to yourself and not its copyright owner or not? really simple question.
1
who owns the copyright on the following code: github.com/thestinger/linux-… ?
1
1
1
it's not about ideas but *source code* and it's fine only as long as copyright law isn't violated. don't you agree?
2
2
we do not tolerate blatant copyright violations from the Kernel Self Protection Project anymore: openwall.com/lists/kernel-ha…
10
97
10
125
there's been no change in the license, our code is still GPLv2 (some gcc plugins are GPL v2/v3 dual-licensed). who claimed otherwise?
1
1
1
restoring balance to the force: openwall.com/lists/kernel-ha…
2
44
6
57
FYI, UDEREF on amd64 already has similar infrastructure for this kind of page table management (for a different purpose).
1
2
3
no it does not but you can also tell by looking at the generated asm, no need to guess. i suggested to disable frame ptrs as an alternative.
1
that nitter.vloup.ch/paxteam/status/8… ? the private version has always had a pass to undo the damage (and more that you aren't aware of yet).
you mean the gcc codegen 'feature' when frame ptrs are enabled? imagine it's fixed or frame ptrs are off and work from there.
1