nitter
PaX Team
@paxteam
pax.grsecurity.net/
Joined February 2010
Tweets
548
Following
2
Followers
2,766
Likes
35
Tweets
Tweets & Replies
Media
Search
Load newest
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
blame is what you're trying to do, identifying the root cause isn't ;).
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
it's not a bug but a problem with gcc (recognized by gcc devs too).
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
defenses don't create bugs, humans do ;).
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
no, the first problem (not bug per se) was due to gcc internals, the defense itself was fine.
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
there're many bugs our defenses caught over the years, just browse lkml or our forums.
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
no, the bug was human error, whereas the defense was automated.
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
Replying to
@Evil_X_
@rootkovska
size overflow, RAP, etc work in userland too and we're not done yet ;).
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
sure, it's proven itself time and again, not many defenses can say the same.
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
Replying to
@rootkovska
they have the same computing power. that's where unbreakable sandboxes come into the picture. the race's on ;).
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
@lolhaq
@Snowden
@subgraph
@QubesOS
@marcan42
that's a great example of how our defenses protect against even our own bugs. thanks!
2
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
Replying to
@i0n1c
that wouldn't be a fix since you can't click what doesn't exist ;).
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
Replying to
@rootkovska
sure, that's the whole raison d'etre of my work.
3
2
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
Replying to
@rootkovska
and PaX is more than memory corruption prevention. think grsec, sandboxes, etc. it's just not me who does all the work ;).
1
3
PaX Team
@paxteam
1 Oct 2016
Replying to
@Snowden
@subgraph
@QubesOS
the whole point of PaX is that you *can* click any OK button without getting owned. not there yet but close :).
1
11
2
18
PaX Team
@paxteam
19 Jul 2016
Replying to
@kangsterizer
'free' in english is ambiguous, see
gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.h…
PaX Team
@paxteam
18 Jul 2016
Replying to
@kangsterizer
so the stable code is libre but not gratuit. i find the use of 'freely' in that context rather disingenuous.
1
PaX Team
@paxteam
18 Jul 2016
Replying to
@kangsterizer
perhaps something got lost in translation as the license never changed, it's still GPLv2 (that of the kernel).
PaX Team
@paxteam
22 Jun 2016
but if you know of a better way that also meets the other features of RAP (e.g., performance, scalability), do share.
PaX Team
@paxteam
22 Jun 2016
and with type diversification (programmer action) it can be arbitrarily refined to approach the intended CFG.
PaX Team
@paxteam
22 Jun 2016
the RAP type hash extracts the maximum information i could think of and what the languges allow.
Load more