theregister.co.uk/2017/08/03… 😂

By the way, I think I have to concede defeat in my attempt to audit RAP, because I haven’t been able to get at the private version, and…

i must have missed your attempt at the public version, where is it?

didn’t I identify a weakness in the public version ages and ages ago? turned out it was (supposedly) solved in the private version.

that is a gcc codegen issue (fixed in RAP) and you never demonstrated anything with it. any other excuses? ;)

is it a bug in GCC? if not, it is not an “issue” in GCC but in your implementation. which you apparently worked around, so good for you.

but without that workaround (“public version”), it would still be an issue, so.

...so do you have an exploit or not? the time you spent on twitter for the past year should have been enough for one... ;)

for that issue? it seems like a waste of time to write one if real systems aren’t affected by it, but I could if you want me to