earlier replies
Replying to @lazytyped @paxteam @marcan42
Indeed: not much (except possibly to deal with interop w/ unprotected code, which I assume isn't involved here as it defeats the purpose.)
2
not much based on your experience which isn't much either? :) hint: it took me 2 months to clean up the bad use of fptrs in a 1MB patch.
1
2
sounds like you did it wrong then. decreases my interest in getting it upstreamed
4
I do not think they care about ur interests. Anyhow, I benefited a lot from their work.
1
of course they don’t - they actively don’t want it to be upstreamed, because that would reduce the value add
2
horseshit ;) they always answered questions, provided explanations and recommendations
1
uh, you’re missing the part where they prevented anyone from looking at it, except for a “demo” which they then attempted to restrict using
1
a supposed loophole in the license (which is bogus, but that’s a separate issue)
2
well, their contributions are beyoublnd RAP. and they gave public talks with lots of details on it for many researchers ;)
1
my point was merely that they don’t want RAP to be upstreamed, not anything general about contributions
3
Replying to @comex @bsdaemon
hey, why don't you go for it tiger, show us you're competent in more than doling out 'expert' opinion on things you don't understand ;).

Apr 29, 2017 · 9:31 AM UTC
1