oh i see grsecurity has /finally/ published their RAP thing, and they still claim it is “ROP-proof”. I guess I should go break it.
4
13
1
45
"patent pending" hmm
2
though maybe not in Clang. if the patent is actually granted.
1
though the fact that the plugins are illegally distributed under GPLv2 rather than v3 might confuse the situation
1
your legal expertise is like your exploit writing skills, empty puffs without evidence ;)
3
But you do realize that ‘plugin_is_GPL_compatible’ is only meant as affirmation for an existing legal requirement?
2
Replying to @comex @enginetankard
sorry but twitter is good for armchair 'experts' at most. go write some code instead, maybe you'll fare better ;).

Feb 10, 2017 · 1:11 AM UTC

1
Replying to @paxteam @enginetankard
I guess that means you don’t have any actual counterargument? Well, at least you’re aware.
1
not the first time you guessed wrong, is it? ;) this is the wrong medium for legal questions.