oh i see grsecurity has /finally/ published their RAP thing, and they still claim it is “ROP-proof”. I guess I should go break it.
4
13
1
45
"patent pending" hmm
2
though maybe not in Clang. if the patent is actually granted.
1
though the fact that the plugins are illegally distributed under GPLv2 rather than v3 might confuse the situation
1
Replying to @comex @enginetankard
your legal expertise is like your exploit writing skills, empty puffs without evidence ;)

Feb 10, 2017 · 12:55 AM UTC

3
Replying to @paxteam @enginetankard
<3
1
Replying to @paxteam @enginetankard
But you do realize that ‘plugin_is_GPL_compatible’ is only meant as affirmation for an existing legal requirement?
2
See gnu.org/prep/standards/stand… “By adding this check to your program you are not creating a new legal requirement.”
1
more replies
Replying to @paxteam @comex
Given mention of patents in the news post I'd expect a little more explanation (how are you going to honor GPLv2 req? DPL?)
1
wrong medium. if you have questions email our contact address please.